The Paradox of Leadership Legacy: Why Vilifying or Deifying Former Leaders Misses the Mark

By Dennis Gulley of the Porch Coaching and Consulting

When a leader leaves an organization—especially an executive leader in a nonprofit or Christian organization—there’s often a wave of emotional reactions. Some people may villainize the leader for what they didn’t accomplish or for mistakes made along the way. Others might go to the other extreme, putting them on a pedestal, and treating their tenure as flawless.

Here’s the thing: neither response is truly fair—or productive.

Leadership is complicated. It’s full of highs and lows, wins and misses, and decisions made in less-than-perfect circumstances. When we paint a former leader as either a saint or a scapegoat, we oversimplify their work, miss the bigger picture, and often hurt the organization in the process.

For nonprofits and faith-based organizations, this issue can feel even more personal. These leaders are often expected to embody the mission and values of the organization, and their departure can stir strong feelings—positive or negative. But the reality is, no leader is perfect, and no leader is entirely at fault for everything that didn’t go right. The truth is usually somewhere in the messy middle.

If you’re a leader still with the organization, how you respond to a former leader’s legacy matters. It shapes your organizational culture, sets the tone for how leadership is perceived, and either strengthens or fractures the mission. So how can we avoid falling into the traps of vilification or deification? Here are a few practical steps to help navigate this transition thoughtfully.

1. Embrace the Complexity of Leadership

Every leader faces challenges you might not have seen from the outside—budget constraints, staffing shortages, unforeseen crises. Similarly, every leader makes decisions that propel the organization forward, even if they don’t make the headlines. It’s important to acknowledge both sides.

Tip: Instead of a black-and-white “legacy review,” take time to assess their tenure holistically. What were their biggest wins? What challenges shaped their leadership? What lessons can the organization carry forward?

2. Show Grace and Gratitude

In nonprofit and Christian leadership especially, grace isn’t just a nice idea—it’s foundational. Leaders are human. They have strengths and weaknesses, just like the rest of us. Showing grace toward a departing leader reflects the values many of us aim to live by.

Tip: Consider hosting a farewell or recognition event for the departing leader. Use it as a chance to celebrate their contributions honestly—acknowledging the highs while being real about the challenges.

3. Focus on the Mission, Not the Person

One of the biggest mistakes organizations make is conflating a leader with the mission itself. Leaders come and go, but the mission stays. When a leader leaves, it’s an opportunity to show that the organization is bigger than any one person.

Tip: Communicate clearly during transitions. Whether it’s through an internal meeting or a public statement, emphasize how the organization is moving forward and how the departing leader contributed to the mission’s progress.

4. Build a Resilient Leadership Culture

If the organization’s success feels tied to one person, transitions will always be rocky. A healthier approach is to foster a culture where leadership is shared, celebrated, and developed across the organization.

Tip: Start investing in emerging leaders now. By equipping others to lead, you create a stronger organization that isn’t overly dependent on any one individual.

5. Model Healthy Communication

What leaders say—and don’t say—about their predecessors sets the tone for how leadership is perceived. If current leaders resort to gossip or criticism, it creates a culture of distrust. On the other hand, glowing over-praise can set impossible expectations for successors.

Tip: Commit to honest, balanced communication about former leaders. Keep your focus on the future, and avoid dwelling on the past.

6. Be Transparent

When a leader leaves under challenging circumstances, it’s easy for speculation to fill the gaps. Transparency helps prevent that. While some details might need to stay confidential, a little openness can go a long way in maintaining trust.

Tip: Share what you can—why the transition is happening, what’s next for the organization, and how the mission will continue to thrive. Transparency builds confidence.

What’s the Bigger Picture?

When we choose to either vilify or deify a former leader, we lose the opportunity to truly learn from their tenure. Every leader—good, bad, or somewhere in between—leaves lessons for those who follow. And the way we talk about their legacy impacts how the next generation of leaders will step into their roles.

For nonprofit and Christian leaders, this is especially critical. Our organizations aren’t just about achieving goals; they’re about living out values. So let’s approach leadership transitions with grace, honesty, and a commitment to the mission.

If you’ve been part of a leadership transition—either as the one leaving or the one staying—what lessons have you learned? How did your organization handle the process? Let’s start a conversation in the comments.

This more balanced and human approach to leadership transitions not only honors those who came before but also sets the stage for thriving futures. Let’s get this right.

Steering with Purpose: Balancing Governance and Mission in Non-Profit Boards

By Dennis Gulley- The Porch Coaching and Consulting

Non-profit boards sit at the heart of organizational success, tasked with a unique challenge: to uphold robust governance while staying true to the passion and impact of their mission. Governance ensures structure, compliance, and sustainability, while the mission embodies the soul of the organization—its reason for existence. Striking a balance between these two elements is crucial. Boards that lean too heavily on policies risk losing the human connection to their cause, while those overly mission-focused may face financial instability or operational chaos. So, how can boards navigate this tension effectively?

Let’s explore the interplay between governance and mission and outline strategies to keep both in harmony.

Understanding Governance and Mission

At its core, governance refers to the policies, structures, and practices that ensure accountability, transparency, and legal compliance. It provides the foundation for decision-making and operational integrity. Strong governance helps maintain donor trust, ensures fiscal responsibility, and keeps the organization compliant with regulations.

The mission, on the other hand, is the heartbeat of a non-profit. It represents the cause, the community served, and the purpose driving the organization forward. A compelling mission energizes board members, staff, and volunteers alike, creating an emotional connection that fuels passion and creativity.

However, governance and mission can sometimes feel at odds. Overemphasis on governance may stifle innovation and alienate passionate members, while neglecting governance risks reputational damage, financial mismanagement, and lost stakeholder confidence. Recognizing this delicate balance is the first step to maintaining both the structure and the soul of your organization.

Why Balance Is Crucial

Balancing governance and mission isn’t just an operational necessity—it’s a strategic imperative for sustaining long-term impact.

1. Maintaining Stakeholder Trust

Donors, regulators, and beneficiaries expect non-profits to be accountable and transparent. Strong governance ensures these expectations are met, while a clear mission inspires trust and ongoing support. Together, they create a virtuous cycle of credibility and commitment.

2. Sustaining Long-Term Impact

Governance provides the stability and infrastructure needed for growth, while a mission-centered approach ensures the organization remains relevant and impactful. A well-balanced board can adapt to change without losing sight of its purpose.

3. Avoiding Burnout and Fatigue

Boards that overemphasize policies risk exhausting members with administrative tasks, potentially disengaging those motivated by the mission. Conversely, boards too focused on passion may create operational inefficiencies, leading to stress and burnout.

Strategies for Balancing Governance and Mission

Achieving this balance requires intentionality. Here are practical strategies to guide your board:

1. Start with a Mission-Driven Governance Framework

Incorporate the mission into your organization’s governance documents, such as bylaws, policies, and strategic plans. Ensure every decision and procedure is evaluated through the lens of the mission. For example, when drafting a financial policy, ask, How does this policy enable us to serve our mission more effectively?

2. Clarify Roles and Responsibilities

A clear distinction between governance and operations is essential. The board should focus on oversight, strategy, and accountability, while staff handle day-to-day activities. Consider appointing a “mission champion” on the board to keep discussions rooted in the organization’s purpose.

3. Foster Open Communication and Collaboration

Regular communication between board members, staff, and stakeholders creates a shared understanding of priorities. Use storytelling in meetings—such as a beneficiary’s success story—to connect members to the real-world impact of their decisions.

4. Regularly Revisit the Mission Statement

Conduct periodic reviews of the mission statement to ensure alignment with organizational goals. Annual retreats can be an excellent opportunity for reflection, ensuring governance practices and operational strategies are advancing the mission.

5. Measure Success in Governance and Mission Terms

Develop key performance indicators (KPIs) that reflect both compliance and mission outcomes. For instance, track financial audits alongside community impact metrics. Share progress reports that balance data-driven governance insights with compelling mission achievements.

6. Strengthen Board Recruitment and Development

Recruit members with diverse skills that address both governance and mission needs. A strong mix of expertise—finance, legal, programmatic, and community engagement—ensures well-rounded decision-making. Provide ongoing training in governance best practices and mission-driven leadership.

A Real-Life Example

Consider the case of a local food bank whose board struggled with balancing governance and mission. Initially, their board meetings were consumed with compliance reviews, leaving little time to discuss community outreach. Recognizing this imbalance, the board introduced storytelling sessions at the start of each meeting, featuring updates from beneficiaries. They also created a governance committee to handle compliance tasks, freeing up the full board to focus on strategic mission-related discussions. The result? Increased member engagement and a stronger alignment between operations and impact.

Conclusion

Balancing governance and mission is a dynamic process, but it’s one that defines the effectiveness of a non-profit board. Governance should be seen not as a barrier, but as a tool for advancing the mission. By embracing a mission-driven governance approach, clarifying roles, fostering communication, and measuring success in holistic terms, boards can create an environment where structure and soul coexist harmoniously.

Take a moment to evaluate your board’s current practices. Are you devoting equal attention to governance and mission? If not, consider adopting some of the strategies outlined here. By steering with purpose, your board can ensure long-term impact while staying true to the heart of your mission.